Guyism After Dark: Gaga, Ciara, or Jessica??? |
- Guyism After Dark: Gaga, Ciara, or Jessica???
- Ariadne Artiles is a name to remember
- VIDEO: Chris Hansen confronting a pawn shop owner is classic Chris Hansen
- VIDEO: People on Xbox Live are “passionate” to say the least
- On Masculinity: The logic behind a threesome
- Model Angela Johnson talks about Ranbir Kapoor
- Aishwarya Rai and Arjun Rampal have decided to co-operate with the producers.
Guyism After Dark: Gaga, Ciara, or Jessica??? Posted: 25 May 2011 04:00 PM PDT Hot links to get you through the night…
|
Ariadne Artiles is a name to remember Posted: 25 May 2011 01:00 PM PDT Ariadne Artiles… Ariadne Artiles… Where have I heard that name? While I try to figure it out, please help yourself to these sexy bikini pics she recently did for Spain’s Telva magazine. Okay, let’s see here… Ariadne Artiles is a Spanish model born January 18th, 1982 in Gran Canaria, one of the Canary Islands, west of Morocco. Nope, that didn’t help. What else can I find? Hmm… she has her own Web site with a sexy opening video, but everything’s in some language I don’t understand. Eh, whatever… sexy Spanish babe in bikinis… good enough. |
VIDEO: Chris Hansen confronting a pawn shop owner is classic Chris Hansen Posted: 25 May 2011 11:30 AM PDT When the worries about online pedophilia subside, where does Chris Hansen go to hassle people? To the people who buy stolen bikes from bike thieves, of course! Not for nothing, but Hansen appears to be losing some of his powers. He kind of backs down a couple times there and his ploy to make the guy take the money to prove he’s lying didn’t really have the Jedi mind powers of when he was talking pederasts into eating cookies. Seems like somebody needs a montage to get their creep-busting act back. Also what kind of shitty idea was it to bring this old white guy there as the muscle? Maybe he was a badass back in ’81 when police could beat people with phone books during interrogations, but he was in way over his head here. This is like seeing Michael Jordan on the Wizards. Chris Hansen Confronts A Bike Thief [Buzzfeed] |
VIDEO: People on Xbox Live are “passionate” to say the least Posted: 25 May 2011 11:05 AM PDT There’s a whole lot of yelling and screaming on XBL. If you’re anything less but a grand master in whatever, expect to get schooled AND chewed out. Though as the following clip demonstrates, even being a nice guy will piss certain people off. Warning: VERY NSWF audio… Reminds me of the dude who once had the gamer tag Jesus Died LOL. Which oddly enough, did not go over well with various gamers. And again, you’ll want to put headphones on if you’re at work… By far my favorite response is when the guys suggested that instead of “lol” it should be a sad face at the end. Excellent point! This is NSFW and truly incredible [Twitter] |
On Masculinity: The logic behind a threesome Posted: 25 May 2011 11:00 AM PDT On Saturday Night Live this week, Justin Timberlake and Andy Samberg made explicit an otherwise unspoken concept of masculinity, which they jokingly referred to as the Golden Rule: "it's not gay if it's in a three-way." But is it? Threesome fantasies are quite common, and Freud even suggested that they are at the foundation of desire itself. We tend to think about "the couple" as the basic unit of sex, but the fact is that our desire is always mediated by some third term, for example, in a man's imaginary relationship to both the mother and the father in the Oedipus complex. Popular wisdom tells us that the one-guy/two-girl threesome is the ultimate male fantasy — what guy doesn't imagine this? — although under scrutiny, it is actually quite unremarkable. Logically, the MFF threesome is merely an extension of so-called "normal" heterosexual male desire, which is to say the desire to have sex with women, and with as many women as possible. In this way, the MFF threesome is nearly identical to and synonymous with heterosexuality, at least from the male perspective. It's simply more of it. The two-guys/one-girl threesome is also "more" sex, but with a twist, since it puts a man in a complex and ambiguous relationship with another. There is a kind of limit inherent in the MFM threesome that makes it much more complicated, although perhaps for that reason, all the more titillating. It's probably a lot more common than you think. This fantasy recalls a more primitive and violent time when copulation was at a premium and an inescapably competitive, bloody affair. In many species, the number of males far outweighs the number of females, a concept that Freud described in mankind as the "primal horde," a band of brothers who must overthrow the Father in order to gain access to his women, lest he keep them all for himself. In this way, one can never be sure in the MFM threesome if the other guy is your friend or your enemy. The problem is a source of all kinds of anxieties and desires that are absent from the MFF threesome. You can make this point by extrapolating the respective fantasies outwards, taking them to their logical limit. If you extend the one-guy/two-girls fantasy by adding on more and more girls (think, MFFFFFFFFF orgy, you perv) then the shape and the meaning of the fantasy stays relatively consistent. The girls are still there essentially to please the man, and if there isn't enough to go around, this "too much" of the fantasy gets re-inscribed into the logic of male desire: his eyes do the work, or the girls can wait their turn on the sidelines, or they can please each other, all of which, in turn, pleases the man. Put simply, it's never a problem to have too many orifices lying around. This is something that can easily be managed, and is actually a kind of fantasy in its own right. On the other hand, if you take the MFM fantasy further, it quickly becomes problematic and requires more and more energetic (or frantic) imaginings. To put this one tongue-in-cheek, there's no spot (or very few) to add another M the MFM without the M's touching. What you have is more and more rivalry, less and less certainty about the others and your position with respect to them. Before you know it, what you've got is a bunch of dudes standing around with their dicks in their hands, staring at each other. This particular "too much" that is unique to the MFM fantasy cannot be as readily re-inscribed into the logic of masculinity. What to do with it? And yet, the appeal of the MFM threesome is precisely in this excessive and hyperbolic display of masculinity, this "phallic-ness" in its extreme. It suggests the possibility that competition can give way to the communal, or that rivalry can become reciprocity. It's the idea of one very large collective phallus. It's a type of "bonding" that always runs the risk of being taken too far. So is the MFM threesome "not gay," as Timberlake and Samberg try to reassure us? The joke — which is what it really is — is brilliant and banal, brilliant in its banality. Jokes are a way of assuaging our anxiety, of providing release from tension. In short, it gives us "something to do" with the excess of the MFM threesome: we laugh, perhaps a little too nervously. Ultimately, the desire of masculinity in this situation is based on the prohibition of homosexuality as much as its possibility. It speaks both, irrevocably, at the same time. |
Model Angela Johnson talks about Ranbir Kapoor Posted: 25 May 2011 04:06 PM PDT Actor Ranbir Kapoor Angela Johnson model often appearing in a revealing Bollywood sensation spread to the corridor. Recently these Kalender Girl actor Shahid Kapoor is in the news because of increasing Njdiqiaan. Angela said a close friend Angela and her family last several days is quite disturbing. Indeed Link - Break up rumors and reports of the use of actors in Bollywood with entries for Angela is very sad. Angela also expressed outrage, saying yes to dinner with me and Ranbir were, but a normal guy - like a girl. I come in Bollywood Ranbir was not used. Being blamed on me that I Link up with Ranbir’s stories leaked. While it’s nothing. I’ll get to own your talent in Bollywood stage. Shahid said Angela on relationships with them once I Anushka Sharma Birthday party got where I was with Ranbir only. I did not speak to Shahid. Nor I have their number.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment